不同牙颌面畸形患者水平髁突角分布特征
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔外科;2.四川大学华西口腔医学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(82360197)


Distribution Characteristics of the Horizontal Condylar Angle in Patients with Different Dentofacial Deformities
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Oral Surgery,Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine;2.State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases National Center for Stomatology National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases,Department of Orthognathic and TMJ Surgery,West China Hospital of Stomatology,Sichuan University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:针对颞下颌关节(temporomandibular joint,TMJ)髁突骨性结构,建立一种基于三维影像的水平髁突角(horizontal condylar angle,HCA)测量方法,分析不同牙颌面畸形类型患者HCA的分布特征及其与偏颌的关系,并探讨其潜在的生物力学适应意义。 方法:收集90例牙颌面畸形患者的颌面部三维CT影像数据,利用Mimics软件进行三维重建与测量。依据ANB角将患者分为骨性Ⅰ类(ANB 0°~4°)、Ⅱ类(ANB >4°)和Ⅲ类(ANB <0°)三组;依据SN-MP角将其分为低角型(<30°)、均角型(30°~38°)和高角型(>38°);依据颏点偏斜量分为偏颌与非偏颌组。比较不同矢状向、垂直向面型及偏颌侧与非偏颌侧之间HCA的差异。 结果:不同矢状骨面型患者的双侧平均HCA存在显著差异(P<0.05),其中骨性Ⅰ类为(19.05±11.03)°,骨性Ⅱ类较大(23.97±11.81)°,骨性Ⅲ类较小(13.61±7.35)°;其中骨性Ⅱ类显著大于骨性Ⅲ类(P<0.05)。偏颌畸形患者偏侧HCA显著大于对侧(P<0.05)。不同垂直骨面型患者HCA差异无统计学意义。 结论:牙颌面畸形患者的髁突在水平面上存在倾斜方向差异,HCA变化可能反映下颌骨生长方向与TMJ适应性改建的关系。偏颌畸形患者的髁突倾斜差异可能为长期不对称负荷下的生物力学适应性重塑。基于三维影像的HCA测量可为TMJ功能状态评估及正颌手术规划提供定量依据。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To establish a three-dimensional (3D) imaging-based method for measuring the horizontal condylar angle (HCA) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), to analyze the distribution characteristics of HCA among different types of dentofacial deformities, and to explore its potential biomechanical significance. Methods: Three-dimensional CT images of 90 patients with dentofacial deformities were collected and reconstructed using Mimics software for HCA measurement. Patients were classified into skeletal Class I (ANB 0°-4°), Class II (ANB >4°), and Class III (ANB <0°) based on the ANB angle; into hypodivergent (<30°), normodivergent (30°-38°), and hyperdivergent (>38°) patterns based on the SN–MP angle; and into asymmetry and non-asymmetry groups based on the Menton deviation. The HCA was compared among different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns and between the deviated and non-deviated sides. Results: Significant differences were observed in the bilateral mean HCA among different sagittal skeletal patterns (P<0.05). The mean HCA was (19.05±11.03)° in skeletal Class I, larger in Class II (23.97±11.81)°, and smaller in Class III (13.61±7.35)°; Class II showed a significantly greater HCA than Class III (P<0.05). In patients with mandibular deviation, the HCA on the deviated side was significantly larger than that on the non-deviated side (P<0.05). No significant differences were found among vertical skeletal patterns. Conclusions: Patients with dentofacial deformities exhibit distinct condylar orientations in the horizontal plane. Variations in HCA across skeletal types may reflect differences in mandibular growth direction and adaptive remodeling of the TMJ. In mandibular deviation, greater HCA on the deviated side may indicate biomechanical adaptation to long-term asymmetric loading. The 3D-based HCA measurement provides a quantitative tool for assessing TMJ morphology and planning orthognathic surgery.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-19
  • 最后修改日期:2025-11-20
  • 录用日期:2025-11-24
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭