直接3D打印与热压膜透明矫治器厚度及贴合精度的比较研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.上海交通大学口腔医学院;2.国家口腔医学中心;3.国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心;4.上海市口腔医学重点实验室;5.上海市口腔医学研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学(12202274, 11932012),国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC2405900)


Comparison of Thickness and Gap Width Between Direct 3D-Printed and Thermoformed Clear Aligners
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Orthodontics, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 对比基于DCA材料的直接3D打印透明矫治器与传统热压膜透明矫治器在厚度和贴合精度方面的差异,为透明矫治器的临床应用提供实验依据。 方法 纳入16名牙列轻度拥挤、无明显龋坏或修复体的成人受试者,分别制作直接3D打印(DPA)和热压膜(TFA)两种透明矫治器。利用高精度电子测厚仪测量两种矫治器在切牙、尖牙和第一磨牙的颊侧、舌侧区域的厚度,采用micro-CT扫描分析矫治器与牙模之间的间隙,并进行统计分析。 结果 直接3D打印矫治器整体平均厚度为(0.60±0.04) mm,显著高于热压膜矫治器的(0.48±0.06) mm (P<0.0001),厚度均一性明显优于热压膜矫治器。直接3D打印矫治器与牙模之间的平均间隙为(0.29±0.08) mm,低于热压膜矫治器的(0.31±0.16) mm (P=0.03),尤其在切牙切端、尖牙颊侧和第一磨牙咬合面区域表现明显更佳(P<0.05)。 结论 与传统热压膜技术相比,基于DCA材料的直接3D打印透明矫治器在厚度均一性和贴合精度均表现出明显优势,提示其在正畸临床治疗中具有更大的应用潜力。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare thickness and gap width between direct 3D-printed clear aligners (DPA) and conventional thermoformed aligners (TFA), providing experimental evidence for clinical application of clear aligners. Methods Sixteen adult subjects with mild dental crowding and without significant caries or restorations were recruited. For each subject, clear aligners were fabricated using direct 3D printing and conventional thermoforming methods, respectively. The aligner thickness was measured at labial/buccal and lingual surfaces of incisors, canines, and first molars using a high-precision electronic thickness gauge. Micro-CT scanning was employed to analyze the gap between the aligners and dental models. Statistical analyses were subsequently performed. Results The overall mean thickness of DPA aligners was (0.60±0.04) mm, significantly higher than TFA aligners (0.48±0.06) mm (P<0.0001), with superior thickness uniformity. The average gap between DPA aligners and dental models was (0.29±0.08) mm, significantly smaller than TFA aligners (0.31±0.16) mm (P=0.03), particularly at incisal edges of incisors, buccal surfaces of canines, and occlusal surfaces of first molars (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared to conventional thermoformed aligners, direct 3D-printed clear aligners using DCA material demonstrate significant advantages in thickness uniformity, fitting accuracy, and adaptability at clinically relevant regions, indicating greater potential for orthodontic clinical application.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-22
  • 最后修改日期:2025-07-22
  • 录用日期:2025-07-28
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭